<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A defence of Boris</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boriswatch.com/2007/09/03/a-defence-of-boris/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boriswatch.com/2007/09/03/a-defence-of-boris/</link>
	<description>Tracking Mayor Boris Johnson every step of the way</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Little Richardjohn</title>
		<link>http://www.boriswatch.com/2007/09/03/a-defence-of-boris/comment-page-1/#comment-661</link>
		<dc:creator>Little Richardjohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 19:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boriswatch.com/2007/09/03/boriswatch-article-on-conservativehome/#comment-661</guid>
		<description>Livingstone's popularity with ordinary Londoners is the best kept political secret around, no matter what the Daily Mail Rentamob say. And this is the main reason why there are no serious conservatives willing to face up to him. They know he would wipe the floor with them. If Livingstone was as unpopular as the usual suspects say, there would be a queue to put the boot in. Instead, we get this affable clown.

Which, to the electorate of London, is what is know as a diabolical liberty. Boris doesn't care about London. He is looking for a bit of a laugh, and this is his idea of one. He is the Tory party's anti-Ken suicide bomber. Only he gets to write the book afterwards.

Apart from looking like a puppy in a paint advert, people like Johnson because they think he's honest. His famous 'shambling' reeks of perpetual apology for something. And people like it when someone seems to apologise to them. Just as Australian teenage girls seek to charm through perpetually asking permission with the rising inflectives of every sentence?

But in reality, what is it that Boris is being honest about and apologising for? As a tory politician, what else can it be but for the bankruptcy of the Tory ideas account? Whatever boarding school experiences pummelled those mannerisms into him, he comes across as the walking embodiment of Tory obsolescence, and his toff credentials are the sporran on the bridegroom, the deerstalker on the laird, the Range Rover in the forecourt, the top hat on the Piccadilly Johnnie. He is perfect for the part.

The trouble is, that throughout a lengthy election campaign he will therefore be a continual advert for tory uselessness- for the fact that it has no reason to exist other than to perpetuate itself. HIs inability to recognise a conflict of interest marks him as a walking disaster area froim day one. Has David Cameron lost his senses? Would anyone vote for someone with that much tactical savoir faire?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Livingstone&#8217;s popularity with ordinary Londoners is the best kept political secret around, no matter what the Daily Mail Rentamob say. And this is the main reason why there are no serious conservatives willing to face up to him. They know he would wipe the floor with them. If Livingstone was as unpopular as the usual suspects say, there would be a queue to put the boot in. Instead, we get this affable clown.</p>
<p>Which, to the electorate of London, is what is know as a diabolical liberty. Boris doesn&#8217;t care about London. He is looking for a bit of a laugh, and this is his idea of one. He is the Tory party&#8217;s anti-Ken suicide bomber. Only he gets to write the book afterwards.</p>
<p>Apart from looking like a puppy in a paint advert, people like Johnson because they think he&#8217;s honest. His famous &#8217;shambling&#8217; reeks of perpetual apology for something. And people like it when someone seems to apologise to them. Just as Australian teenage girls seek to charm through perpetually asking permission with the rising inflectives of every sentence?</p>
<p>But in reality, what is it that Boris is being honest about and apologising for? As a tory politician, what else can it be but for the bankruptcy of the Tory ideas account? Whatever boarding school experiences pummelled those mannerisms into him, he comes across as the walking embodiment of Tory obsolescence, and his toff credentials are the sporran on the bridegroom, the deerstalker on the laird, the Range Rover in the forecourt, the top hat on the Piccadilly Johnnie. He is perfect for the part.</p>
<p>The trouble is, that throughout a lengthy election campaign he will therefore be a continual advert for tory uselessness- for the fact that it has no reason to exist other than to perpetuate itself. HIs inability to recognise a conflict of interest marks him as a walking disaster area froim day one. Has David Cameron lost his senses? Would anyone vote for someone with that much tactical savoir faire?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.boriswatch.com/2007/09/03/a-defence-of-boris/comment-page-1/#comment-600</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 21:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boriswatch.com/2007/09/03/boriswatch-article-on-conservativehome/#comment-600</guid>
		<description>That "Compass" report is a good laugh to read but I challange anyone to take it seriously. Their view of Boris is obvious from the beginning, by advertantly only showing his opinions that go against the tide of what they believe is "public opinion" I'm suprised that at the end it didn't reveal a world exclusive that Boris was a prowd "nazi" or "communist revolutionary."

You have the right to say what you believe, thank god someone still has the bravery to do it.

!!!!Go Boris!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That &#8220;Compass&#8221; report is a good laugh to read but I challange anyone to take it seriously. Their view of Boris is obvious from the beginning, by advertantly only showing his opinions that go against the tide of what they believe is &#8220;public opinion&#8221; I&#8217;m suprised that at the end it didn&#8217;t reveal a world exclusive that Boris was a prowd &#8220;nazi&#8221; or &#8220;communist revolutionary.&#8221;</p>
<p>You have the right to say what you believe, thank god someone still has the bravery to do it.</p>
<p>!!!!Go Boris!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StevenL</title>
		<link>http://www.boriswatch.com/2007/09/03/a-defence-of-boris/comment-page-1/#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator>StevenL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 20:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boriswatch.com/2007/09/03/boriswatch-article-on-conservativehome/#comment-594</guid>
		<description>Have you read some of the stuff 'Compass' turn out?  They are communists, not centre-left, they have the same old dream of the end of capitalism and democracy as we know it.  Their membership are a confused bunch of people who look around the world and see injustice, and believe the only way to solve that injustice is to inflict and equal amount of injustice on every human being on the planet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you read some of the stuff &#8216;Compass&#8217; turn out?  They are communists, not centre-left, they have the same old dream of the end of capitalism and democracy as we know it.  Their membership are a confused bunch of people who look around the world and see injustice, and believe the only way to solve that injustice is to inflict and equal amount of injustice on every human being on the planet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
