<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boris and a whiff of scandal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boriswatch.com/2004/08/17/boris-and-a-whiff-of-scandal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boriswatch.com/2004/08/17/boris-and-a-whiff-of-scandal/</link>
	<description>Tracking Mayor Boris Johnson every step of the way</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave McTavish</title>
		<link>http://www.boriswatch.com/2004/08/17/boris-and-a-whiff-of-scandal/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave McTavish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2004 09:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boriswatch.com/wp/?p=61#comment-60</guid>
		<description>There are other reasons why he's so circumspect on this issue. Shall we say, certain pots don't want to be caught calling certain kettles black?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are other reasons why he&#8217;s so circumspect on this issue. Shall we say, certain pots don&#8217;t want to be caught calling certain kettles black?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.boriswatch.com/2004/08/17/boris-and-a-whiff-of-scandal/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2004 19:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boriswatch.com/wp/?p=61#comment-59</guid>
		<description>The fact that Boris's publisher is having an affair with one of the most left wing men in the country may explain the Spectator's lurch to the left.  I always thought it was strang that they were recruiting so many left wing journalists and publishing articles that no Tory could be expected to enjoy reading (e.g. bashing toffs).  Now it makes sense.  Who cares about the Spectator's circulation when you're busy making Mad Dog Blunkett happy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that Boris&#8217;s publisher is having an affair with one of the most left wing men in the country may explain the Spectator&#8217;s lurch to the left.  I always thought it was strang that they were recruiting so many left wing journalists and publishing articles that no Tory could be expected to enjoy reading (e.g. bashing toffs).  Now it makes sense.  Who cares about the Spectator&#8217;s circulation when you&#8217;re busy making Mad Dog Blunkett happy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
